# Read the first page of The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene Read the opening of The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene free, no signup. A tour through space, time, quantum theory, cosmology, and the structure of reality. - Page: https://uncovered.ink/read/the-fabric-of-the-cosmos-brian-greene - Genre: Physics - Year: 2004 - ISBN: 9780141959955 - Read it blind (cover and title hidden): https://uncovered.ink/?b=9780141959955&s=read-page - Buy: https://bookshop.org/a/125786/9780141959955 - Borrow: https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=9780141959955 ## The opening @@CHAP@@ Roads to Reality @@CHAP@@ Space, Time, and Why Things are as They are None of the books in my father’s dusty old bookcase were forbidden. Yet while I was growing up, I never saw anyone take one down. Most were massive tomes—a comprehensive history of civilization, matching volumes of the great works of western literature, numerous others I can no longer recall—that seemed almost fused to shelves that bowed slightly from decades of steadfast support. But way up on the highest shelf was a thin little text that, every now and then, would catch my eye because it seemed so out of place, like Gulliver among the Brobding-nagians. In hindsight, I’m not quite sure why I waited so long before taking a look. Perhaps, as the years went by, the books seemed less like material you read and more like family heirlooms you admire from afar. Ultimately, such reverence gave way to teenage brashness. I reached up for the little text, dusted it off, and opened to page one. The first few lines were, to say the least, startling. “There is but one truly philosophical problem, and that is suicide,” the text began. I winced. “Whether or not the world has three dimensions or the mind nine or twelve categories,” it continued, “comes afterward”; such questions, the text explained, were part of the game humanity played, but they deserved attention only after the one true issue had been settled. The book was The Myth of Sisyphus and was written by the Algerian-born philosopher and Nobel laureate Albert Camus. After a moment, the iciness of his words melted under the light of comprehension. Yes, of course, I thought. You can ponder this or analyze that till the cows come home, but the real question is whether all your ponderings and analyses will convince you that life is worth living. That’s what it all comes down to. Everything else is detail. My chance encounter with Camus’ book must have occurred during an especially impressionable phase because, more than anything else I’d read, his words stayed with me. Time and again I’d imagine how various people I’d met, or heard about, or had seen on television would answer this primary of all questions. In retrospect, though, it was his second assertion—regarding the role of scientific progress—that, for me, proved particularly challenging. Camus acknowledged value in understanding the structure of the universe, but as far as I could tell, he rejected the possibility that such understanding could make any difference to our assessment of life’s worth. Now, certainly, my teenage reading of existential philosophy was about as sophisticated as Bart Simpson’s reading of Romantic poetry, but even so, Camus’ conclusion struck me as off the mark. To this aspiring physicist, it seemed that an informed appraisal of life absolutely required a full understanding of life’s arena—the universe. I remember thinking that if our species dwelled in cavernous outcroppings buried deep underground and so had yet to discover the earth’s surface, brilliant sunlight, an ocean breeze, and the stars that lie beyond, or if evolution had proceeded along a different pathway and we had yet to acquire any but the sense of touch, so everything we knew came only from our tactile impressions of our immediate environment, or if human mental faculties stopped developing during early childhood so our emotional and analytical skills never progressed beyond those of a five-year-old—in short, if our experiences painted but a paltry portrait of reality—our appraisal of life would be thoroughly compromised. When we finally found our way to earth’s surface, or when we finally gained the ability to see, hear, smell, and taste, or when our minds were finally freed to develop as they ordinarily do, our collective view of life and the cosmos would, of necessity, change radically. Our previously compromised grasp of reality would have shed a very different light on that most fundamental of all philosophical questions. ## Books with a similar feel - [A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking](https://uncovered.ink/read/a-brief-history-of-time-stephen-hawking.md) - [Universal by Brian Cox & Jeff Forshaw](https://uncovered.ink/read/universal-brian-cox-and-jeff-forshaw.md) - [The Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra](https://uncovered.ink/read/the-tao-of-physics-fritjof-capra.md) - [Wherever You Go, There You Are by Jon Kabat-Zinn](https://uncovered.ink/read/wherever-you-go-there-you-are-jon-kabat-zinn.md) - [The Power of Habit by Charles Duhigg](https://uncovered.ink/read/the-power-of-habit-charles-duhigg.md) - [Ultralearning by Scott H. Young](https://uncovered.ink/read/ultralearning-scott-h-young.md) --- Source: Uncovered (https://uncovered.ink). A short sample shown for reading and discovery. Rights holders can request removal at https://uncovered.ink/takedown.